Welcome

I'm Kyle Hutzler - a sixteen year old highly interested in business, economics, and finance. Over the past two years, I've spent upwards of 200 hours working on a policy paper on education reform. My original intentions with this paper - completed independently - were simply to make the most of my perverse sense of fun. Along the way, I happened to learn of the Davidson Fellowship - a scholarship for gifted high-school students.

It was from here that I began to redirect the work for submission - garnering the support of professionals close to home and around the country. In July 2008, I learned that I was selected as a 2008 Fellow and was honored to attend the awards ceremony at the Library of Congress in September. Here you will find the portfolio as submitted in March 2008.
- Fall 2008

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Paying up

Tuitition


4.1 The base tuition for all schools will initially be $10,000 per child; the maximum government contribution will be $15,000— each expected to increase in adherence with progressive systems. The specific tuition for all school’s will vary depending upon three sets of factors— predetermined factors, performance, and incentives-based.

The median per-pupil expenditure for students, as measured by the U.S. Department of Education in 2005, was $9,392; the 95th percentile: $18,100.[1]


4.2 The district will receive financing of $150-250 per child.


While the funding may vary significantly between schools, every effort will be made to ensure that the levels of financing are relative to the performance and needs of all schools.

Predetermined

4.3 The location of the school will weigh heavily on the school’s individual funding. Urban facilities and staffs will cost more to maintain and expand. In the same respect, rural schools will be allocated additional funds for transportation.
4.4 Elementary schools will receive additional funding—and subsequent scrutiny, to provide individualized services, ensuring literacy, a cost effective means to limit the expense and problems of lingering illiteracy in secondary schooling.

Performance

4.5 Schools that exceed superior standards for student basic skills will receive a maximum increase in funding of 2.5%. For example, a school that has 80% of students in the satisfactory range, five percentage points out of twenty-five more than the required amount, will receive a .5% increase—or one-fourth of the possible amount.


4.6 Schools that focus heavily on the arts and vocational studies receive an additional potential amount of $1,000 ($11,000-$16,000) to justify the additional burdens of pursuing mastery of both their specialty and core courses. Unlike similar performance funding, the percentage of a school’s population within the exceptional to superior range will determine the total amount per child awarded to schools.


Incentives based programs

4.7 In order to promote competitiveness between schools, the government will provide additional allocations to school’s that pursue its various incentives.
4.8 The primary incentives program will be a school’s performance in voluntary adherence to the more strict, complete curriculum. Schools that also seek to promote diversity, integrate students of lower socioeconomic status will also be allocated additional resources to encourage further inclusion by other successful schools.
4.9 Schools will also be encouraged to accommodate poor-performing students from other schools. The government would offer an additional $1,000 to schools under the $15,000 maximum for increased performance from students who performed poorly in other schools in the last year’s examination.


If for example, a school’s total population from other school’s last year was 74% on the basic examinations and increases to 90% this year, the school receives an additional $160 per child – including those not from poorer performing schools. This structure will encourage competition as well as maximize the opportunities available to each student.


4.10 Another such incentive will be a school’s adherence to the recommended budget allocation for schools that share similar characteristics. Another measure will award schools for students that are enrolled in college-level courses. Additionally, schools will be rewarded for a dropout rate below the national average; and participation in arts and sports— standardized records per sport and adjudications will serve as the basis for these allocations.

Stability

4.11 To prevent rapid fluctuations in school tuitions as well as to ensure that funding is being used effectively, mechanisms will be implemented to ensure stable funding from year to year.
4.12 Bonuses from previous years are priced in to the school’s upcoming year’s budget. Schools whose performance decreases will only lose a small portion of their relative bonuses from the previous years. Additionally, small portions of such bonuses are reclaimed each year to prevent an accumulation of resources that cannot be spent.
Special grants

4.13 Special grants are awarded to schools that pursue pilot programs,
expansions, and maintenance, allocated by the district.


Hybrid schools

4.14 In what will be appealing primarily to schools that have maxed out their maximum government contribution, schools will also have the opportunity to initiate a hybrid-funding program, receiving funds from both the government and parents.

4.15 The school will determine the required parent contribution, however,
participating schools must also adhere to mirroring standards to ensure that
cost is not used as a blunt instrument to reduce the counts of those who could
not otherwise afford the school.


4.16 The government will provide a fair valuation metric for parents to compare the true value of their school.
4.17 Certain schools run by organizations or religious associations will choose to provide all of its funding from other sources that do not directly tax students’ parents.

Bob Chase, the former President of the National Education Association, is right. “Many politicians talk tough about holding students and teachers accountable. But while they have zero tolerance for underachieving kids, they have abundant tolerance for underfunded schools.”[2]

[1] Expenditures per pupil at the 5th, median, and 95th percentile cutpoints and federal range ratio for public elementary and secondary school districts in the United States, by district type and type of expenditure: Fiscal year 2005. National Center for Education Statistics. Department of Education. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/revexpdist05/tables/table_5.asp?referrer=list
[2] Teacher’s Unions and Teacher Politics. American Education. Joel Spring. Tenth Edition. McGraw Hill. 2002. Page 55.

No comments: